Tag Archives: Week 7

Week 7: The Little Mermaid

Posted on by
1

Reading The Little Mermaid this week has been intriguing. (I haven’t actually seen the Disney version either so this is my first impression of the “Original” Little Mermaid before I invest time in watching the Disney twist).

I am really intrigued by the imagery and descriptive words used by the author to describe this “underground” water-world. Various aspects of the text foster the idea that the human world is very glorious. Furthermore, the princesses described their initial response to visually seeing the human world in a way that encourages an appreciation for our world. For example, one of the princesses compared the sunset sky to “gold” to create a visual for the other princesses of how different and more fantastic our world is than the water-world. This is important because it highlights the humanity that exists amongst these creatures. The aspect of their humanity is significant because it creates an element of relatability to our temptations and curiosity. It is natural for us humans to be curious, to want to explore different countries and learn about different cultures. Similarly, these mermaids had the same curiosity.

Week 7: Hans Christian Andersen’s The Little Mermaid

Posted on by
2

I remember being about ten years old when I first read Hans Christian Andersen’s The Little Mermaid. Needless to say, I was horrified by how different it was from the lighthearted 1989 Disney adaptation so many kids grew up with. It was more graphic, more painful, and, for lack of a better word, more sad.

Andersen’s mermaid does not have a name, whereas I wished to be named Ariel after my favorite Disney princess. The rules of going to the surface are also less restrictive than in the Disney adaptation, as a merperson’s journey to the surface is seen as a coming-of-age ceremony, and after that point, could go to the surface whenever they want rather than being forbidden from ever going up. Ariel’s tail becomes two legs from flashes of light and swirls of smoke, while Andersen’s mermaid mutilates herself by cutting off her tongue to pay the price for her transformation. The presence of the little mermaid’s grandmother and her sisters is noticeably absent from the Disney adaptation, which, in some ways, enhances the little mermaid’s loneliness rather than detracts from it. It’s also notable that the little mermaid experiences pain with every step she takes on her human legs, while Ariel does not seem to suffer any adverse effects of her transformation other than being unable to use her words. The most notable difference between Andersen’s story and the Disney adaptation is that Andersen’s little mermaid does not get her prince charming in the end; all of her sacrifices are rendered useless and go unappreciated because they are unsaid.

Rereading this story as an adult almost made me cry in my living room, especially knowing what I know now about Hans Christian Andersen and his rocky romantic relationships. Because of that, it’s no wonder that mermaids and many mermaid stories are often read through a queer lens, and no wonder that this story is so full of yearning and suffering.

Week 7: The Little Mermaid and the Hardships of Maturity

Posted on by
1

In this week’s assigned reading, The Little Mermaid, written by Hans Christian Andersen, the story of a young mermaid’s desire to discover a new world is told. Andersen presents his main character, the little mermaid, whose name is never mentioned, as the youngest of six sisters. All under the care of their grandmother, the king’s mother. The grandmother carries in her tail twelve oyster shells that represent not only her mature age and knowledge but also her rank. It is revealed by her that mermaids are given the chance of a lifetime to witness human life above the waters once they turn the age of fifteen. When I read this I thought about my Mexican culture that holds special events for fifteen-year-olds called Quinceañeras; the celebration of a girl’s 15th birthday, marking her passage from girlhood to womanhood. At that moment I realized The Little Mermaid is not only a story of innocent romance but of a mermaid coming of age.

From the moment the story begins, the six mermaid sisters are presented, all of them having plots of garden to plant whatever they please. All of them plant flowers that take the forms of sea creatures, however, the youngest plants her red flowers in the shape of the sun, which points to her child-like fascination with what is above the waters (that also foreshadows her ending as a daughter of the air). After all of her five siblings get to experience the human world it has come to be the little mermaid’s turn and her grandmother dresses her granddaughter’s tail with eight oyster shells, “Well now you are grown up…so let me dress you like your sisters…and the old dame ordered eight large oyster shells to be fastened to the princess’s tail, to denote her high rank.” (Bacchilega & Brown 113) To this, the little mermaid lets her grandmother know that the decoration hurt her, and her grandmother responds with “Pride must suffer pain,” (Bacchilega & Brown 113) this reminds me of “beauty is pain”, a well-known saying that is told to women the moment they enter adolescence. According to the history of corsets, a young woman would start wearing corsets at the age of fifteen, a neat parallel to what is happening in the story.

After being told by the sea witch that she would turn into sea foam if the prince didn’t end up loving her and marrying her at the hands of a priest to acquire a soul and be able to have a soul that’ll live for eternity she took the impulsive risk, confiding that she would be successful. It is no secret that some young women fall under the belief that they’ll get to marry their first love, some do, and some don’t. The moment the prince lets the little mermaid know about his marriage to another princess even though heartbroken this is where she starts to see life differently, she starts maturing, and it shows when she chooses to not murder the prince to transform back into a mermaid. This, fortunately, transforms her into a daughter of the air, with the opportunity to experience human life and get to heaven.

The nature elements in this story play their part in representing the innocence and curiosity of the little mermaid, from saving the prince around the end of winter and acquiring her maturity by spring, it all points to a wholesome new beginning for our main character.

Week 7: The little Mermaid

Posted on by
3

This week’s reading focused on Hans Christian Anderson’s “Little Mermaid” folktale. I have never read the original story of the little mermaid and found so many similarities to the Disney adaptation of it. What I found that Disney kept the most similar in the adaptation was the fact that this is sort of a coming of age story. It seems like there’s always a theme to each of these mermaid stories that the mermaid is just a symbol for something larger; they’re always meant to teach us, and that brings me back to the roots of the word monster having meanings of teaching. In this folktale specifically, it seemed like a coming of age story mostly, sprinkled in with Christian values and expected gender roles. The grandmother in the story makes this tradition around the 15th birthday as when “[they] have accomplished your 15th year” (page 109), they were able to go up and see the world above. The 15th birthday held much significance in this story as that was the age the young mermaids were allowed see the entire world for the first time. This tradition reminds me of the Mexican tradition, where on your 15th birthday you’re basically seen as an adult as a young woman, and have a Quinceañera. I can see a lot of history, sort of repeating itself within the stories and everyone as a society having the similar culture just in different fonts. I think that significant because it really shows how similar we are as human beings, regardless of where we come from and when we came from. This notion of you vs the unknown really goes away when you realize our similarities even when it is portrayed through something so different, such as a mermaid.

(posted before 6pm, just edited a typo)

The Little Foundling

Posted on by
2

I found the story of The Little Mermaid by Han Chistian Anderson very intriguing, although I cannot compare it to the Disney film because I have never watched it. While reading through the story, I found it had some religious and environmental relevance.

A major religious connection was towards the ending when Ariel became an air entity. At first, I thought she may have been turned in to a Siren, but after reading, “…your own good works may obtain you an immortal soul…thus we shall glide into the Kingdom of Heaven…” I though different (Anderson 130). Although, the “daughters of the air” do not possess an immortal soul like humans, they can obtain one and enter heaven by doing good deeds, similar to what we are taught in Christianity. The story describes the daughters of the air by the following, “Their language was melody, but too ethereal to be heard by human ears, just as no human eye can discern their forms. Though without wings, their lightness poised them into the air.” (129). This description is comparable to that of a ghost’s and given she is in neither heaven nor hell can mean Ariel may be in Purgatory which is present in Catholicism.

The connection I made from the story to the environment is also towards the end. One line that caught my attention was, “We fly to warm countries, and fan the burning atmosphere, laden with pestilence, that destroys the sons of man.” (129). During the 19th century, when The Little Mermaid was published (1837), there were many deaths caused by illnesses including Smallpox, Typhus, and Yellow Fever, I’m assessing this would be connected to the “pestilence” mentioned in the quote. Also, the Industrial Revolution was in motion during the time of this publication and had harsh effects on the environment due to the pollution which can be connected to the “burning atmosphere” description. If my assessments are correct, I wonder why Anderson decided to include this in his story, where these wingless air entities that can neither be seen nor heard seems very different than that of a mermaid and human.

The Little Mermaid

Posted on by
1

I remember reading the Hans Christian Andersen story of the little mermaid when I was quite young. I remember being surprised by the darker tone of this story compared to the Disney version that I knew. It wasn’t until the casting of the live action adaptation of the little mermaid that I started to hear more insight about the original story. Through social media I learned it that it is widely believed that the story is meant to be an allegory of queerness and particularly of a failed love of Andersen’s. I set off to re-read this story again with this in mind.

Immediately I noticed how different the point of view of the story is. It is still third person point of view but it seems that it is limited to the experience of the Little Mermaid. This makes it so that we can see the story through her experience rather than our known human experience. It is important to point this out because I do not believe we see this within any of our other assigned readings. Due to this we are able to see the Little Mermaid as closer to human than to the unknown. As I was reading this I was interested by what her grandmother tells her as she is asking about human lives. The grandmother says, “Your fish’s tail, which is a beauty amongst us sea-folk, is thought a deformity on earth, because they know no better.” (Page 119). It seems to me like Andersen could just as easily be talking about how society perceives queerness. Queerness, especially throughout the history of Christianity has been heavily stigmatized much like the mermaid. Here then, we see a story that is not necessarily meant to influence the reader into Christianity. Rather we start seeing the use of the mermaid to examine the other as being queer. It’s a fascinating shift on mermaid lore and one that applies to its time. This is also the century in which Oscar Wilde produces literature that goes on to become part of the literary cannon while at the same time we know he was incarcerated and eventually ostracized for his sexuality.

The Little Mermaid

Posted on by
1

This week, we finally read an all-time classic, “The Little Mermaid” by Hans Christian Anderson. Some of the main themes I wanted to focus on in this blog post are the ideas of pain being normalized in feminism and also the idea of belonging to a group or place.

The little mermaid is told by an older, wiser mermaid that “pain must suffer pride” because she was wearing uncomfortable clothing. The little mermaid, being youngest of her sisters, grew up watching her siblings enter womanhood feeling equally uncomfortable. This is something that I feel a lot of young women see growing up, which in a way could be conditioning them to accept a life of pain because it’s “normal”. But why is it normal? The little mermaid feels immense pain in her legs every time she takes a step. It is almost as if she is being punished for being curious, in the same way Raymondin was. I’ve noticed that in a lot of the stories we have read in class, people who are curious tend to be punished.

Another interesting thing from the reading is the idea that Mermaids do not have souls while humans do, and they are aware of this. Mermaids are only given souls if “a priest lay his right hand” (pg 144) on them in order to officiate a marriage. This idea taps into the subconscious beliefs that Christianity has planted in both men and women that marriage is a necessity to have a completed life. But there is really nothing natural about marriage, it is a man-made concept. I love this idea because if souls exist, they have absolutely nothing to do with man-made concepts, they’d be natural and work in natural ways. Meanwhile, people are reading these popular stories, and while they may not necessarily believe they need matrimony in order to have a soul, they could potentially unintentionally develop the need to find a partner for marriage in order to truly feel complete.

This reading caught me off guard. I did not expect to enjoy this chapter as much as I did, and I feel that the reason for this is because the ideas of feminism and the symbolism are extremely telling of how society was at the time. It’s interesting to see how much yet how little has changed since then.

Week 7: My First Impression of The Little Mermaid… ever.

Posted on by
1

Hello all!

This week we all read Hans Christian Anderson’s The Little Mermaid. I’m sure many of us had never read the tale before, but I assume plenty of my classmates had watched the animated Disney film of the same name. I have not. The ride at California Adventure is where I’ve had the most interaction with The Little Mermaid; my friend took me on the ride a couple of times because there’s a slope near the beginning of it that keeps you relatively hidden, so we would hit their wax pen and be all goofy for the rest of our visit. You get the gist of the animated film’s story through attraction: Ariel lives under the sea but yearns to be a human, falls in love with a prince, they get married, neptune attends the wedding and everything is happily ever after. I knew the original story was darker, but I had no idea it was as sad and harrowing as it actually was.

Just a couple of things that interest me about the story:

  1. The fact that, in order to gain human legs, she had to give up her tongue is CRAZY. That stacked with the addition of her NEEDING him to marry her or she would die. Physically not being able to explain to the Prince that she was the one who saved him is such a scary predicament – it kinda left a pit in my stomach as I was reading.
  2. I think the note about mermaids dying and turning into seafoam is so neat. I wonder if Anderson came up with that himself or if it was a pre-established detail in the mythology around mermaids at the time. I have the image of a lonely sailor coming across a patch of seafoam in the middle of the sea and telling that to himself to make the monotony of floating in the ocean a little less dreadful.
  3. I was a little confused about the ending. Did she turn into a cloud? Where was the cloud going? Was she to eventually turn back into a mermaid? I’d love to discuss it.

Those were three big takeaways I got from Anderson’s The Little Mermaid. I really enjoyed my reading of it.

The Little Mermaid

Posted on by
1

Reading the original story of The Little Mermaid when I grew up with the 1989 Disney version, I can see some major contrasts between the plot and tone. In Andersen’s story, there is a more melancholic tone to the story and it shows themes of sacrifice and consequences of the desire for love. Similar to the Disney film, the little mermaid sacrifices herself to be with the prince, but she doesn’t end up with him and she dissolves into sea foam instead. She makes a choice of selflessness and sacrifice. Throughout this story, there’s less emphasis on the little mermaid’s actual personality and more just the fact that she is longing for an eternal soul. I wouldn’t consider the end of the story a tragic ending because she earns an immortal soul from making the right decisions and choosing not to be selfish.

The Disney version of the little mermaid is more fairytale like and lighthearted, but the two stories still definitely share some characteristics. Andersen’s tale focuses on themes of sacrifice, redemption, and the pursuit of a soul, while Disney’s version emphasizes themes of love, self-discovery, and personal agency. Disney’s obviously was written for a broad audience of families and children so their goal was to entertain and lift the spirits of their viewers. While the central plot remains similar, with the Little Mermaid sacrificing herself for the prince, the Disney version provides a more definitive and conventionally happy ending where love triumphs over adversity, and the protagonist is rewarded with her happily ever after. Disney’s story has a clear moral message and universal appeal, while Andersen’s can be perceived in varying perspectives. The differences in tone and thematic focus between Andersen’s original tale and Disney’s adaptation reflect the distinct intentions of the authors. Andersen’s was written with different intentions as it provided moral lessons and social commentary. I see his story as a cautionary tale about the consequences of sacrificing ones self for the sake of love or ambition. Andersen used his story to explore deeper philosophical and existential themes, rather than just for mere entertainment purposes. I think it is so interesting for me to learn about the original story versus the adaptation that I grew up with. I hope we see more of this in our future readings!

Week Seven: The Little Mermaid

Posted on by
Reply

After reading Hans Christian Andersons version of the Little Mermaid, I was very intrigued with the similarities and differences of the Disney movie. I would say that most of the plot was pretty similar, minus the ending and other small details. One concept that intrigued me a lot was the relationship between the Prince and the Little Mermaid. In Hans depiction of it, as the mermaid had no voice or song, she was mute, and the Prince looked at her more as a pet than a lover. One line in the story states “The prince declared that he would never part with her, and she obtained leave to sleep on a velvet cushion before his door.” (page 144) I thought this description was quite interesting, as he gives her permission to sleep outside his door basically on a fancy dog bed. This takes away the little mermaids morality and quite literally turns her into his pet. Their relationship is quite interesting in the story, as he views her as his “little foundling” and pet, but says if he was inclined to marriage it would be with her. This dynamic threw me off just because of how he refers to her in adoration but also disrespect. As he says he never wants her to leave his side, yet he called her his little foundling and his “dumb child.” This could be his way of showing his affection, but it is also clear that he has romanic feeling for the girl who saved him form his death, and even though the mermaid is she, he could never love her. Another aspect of this version of the Little Mermaid that surprised me was how it ended with her death, and her becoming sea foam. The witch didn’t become the new bride, nor did the mermaid end up with the prince. It was a bittersweet ending, as instead of saving herself and killing the prince, she sacrificed herself to the Ocean, sort of facing the consequences she got herself into. I appreciated the non-cliche ending, but it was also sad to see how the prince ended up happy and the little mermaid did not because he didn’t love her or give her his immortal soul. This goes back to the question: Why did she need a man for her happiness and life? This is a repeating question I find myself asking almost after every story or tale we read. Almost all the women depicted in these stories long for a human man and a human love, to save them. I think this goes back to show the idea of the patriarchy even now, and the stereotypes put on love and happiness. Not only do women have the expectation of sacrificing earthing for a husband or family, but also the idea of how the Little mermaid was looked at as a pet, not another human being.