Hands/Fingers as a Symbol of Female Defiance and Strength- Final Essay

Hands are a way of producing action, they are the way we grasp, fight, endure, etc. without the full capabilities of one’s hands productivity and functionality decrease as these actions cannot be performed to the fullest extent or to no extent at all. The Legend of Sedna the Sea Goddess, by Lenore Lindeman, 1999, is an Inuit origin/creation tale that details the story of a young girl’s trials after promising herself a marriage. When she later discovers that her husband is not who he says he is, she flees with her father, who murders her husband out of anger. While Sedna and her father attempt to escape on the boat, this action causes the husband´s friends to seek revenge and Sedna´s father throws her off the boat in hopes that they will stop their pursuit but they do not. Sedna clings to the boat side for her life after being thrown overboard, yet her father cuts off her fingers one by one to prevent himself from drowning. She sinks to the bottom of the sea where the segments of her fingers turn into sea mammals, and she becomes the Sea Goddess, who has the power to control these animals and their abundance to man. In correlation, The Water Will Carry Us Home by  Gabrielle Tesfaye is a 2018 stop-motion animation and film that reveals the stories of impregnated African slaves being thrown off slave ships by seamen whilst sailing through the Middle Passage. While these women are sentenced to drowning through tied hands, they are rescued by Yoruba Orishas, a divine water spirit that transforms them into powerful water entities. Freed from their past traumas, they embrace their newfound existence in the ocean with their children.  By delving into the thematic significance of hands/fingers as a focal point of trauma, The Legend of Sedna the Sea Goddess and The Water Will Carry Us Home demonstrates the transformation of women after painful and constraining experiences. Despite the assumption that removal or restraint of hands would prevent survival, both tales reveal how trauma to the woman at the will of a man is a detachment from victimhood. The analysis of the symbolic role of women’s hands/fingers in these stories, challenges conventional notions of female weakness, illustrating the enduring strength of the female spirit. In these tales, the severance or constraint of hands serves as a defiance against the expectation of women’s weakness in the face of male power. Rather than victims, these women emerge as their own saviors, empowered by their resilience and determination.

The symbol of a man is a consistent and central aspect in both of these storylines, specifically the initial physical power and control that the men have over Sedna and the African woman. Focusing on the theme of “the Man” in relation to the constricting of the hands,  further allows the storyline to emphasize the focus of the women’s physical transformations. First, in Sedna’s story there is constant mention of men in association with fulfillment and commitment., “…men desired,…”, “…he provided…”, and “…man promised…”, where the men are participating in acts revolving around committing to Sedna. The father’s boat represents her family as a whole and is the sole controller of her fate, just as he was in her life. In Inuit culture fathers are modeled as family protectors, and it is their role to dedicate themselves to the safekeeping of their family’s well-being, yet the situation is entirely upside down in this scenario. It is important to recognize that it is her father who sacrifices her fingers and sentences him to drown in order to protect himself. Sedna is victimized by the deception and lies of her husband, the control of her father, and the unwilling sacrifice that is forced upon her, although she does not allow it to drag her down. The Water Will Carry Us Home follows a similar male focus as the males as the aggressors and deciders of the woman’s fate. At 3 minutes and 47 seconds, the white men can be seen dangling a woman over the crashing water, after grabbing the woman with ropes and binding their hands together. These powerful men are central to this very moment in the story and are not showcased during other scenes, which is important because it directly correlates to the woman’s hands being tied and sentencing them to the waters. At the beginning of both of these stories, dominating male figures contribute to the notion of women being weak and less than men, as they are initially perceived as having no power. This stature of no power may be seen through the representation of the woman as being controlled by the men and following the rules of the men around them.

The actions being performed on these women’s hands, in the form of severing or constraining, serve as a defiance against the expectation of women’s weakness in the face of male power, and demonstrate strength in the face of trauma. The trauma represents both Sedna and the slaves’ unwilling sacrifice by male counterparts, who intentionally use the woman’s hands to prevent their survival. The defiance against expectations may be seen in the woman’s strength to persevere, as slaves at the time were not seen in a prevailing light and princesses were taught to obey the laws of their father rather than to seek their own lives.  

Diving directly into the hands and how they are handled differently/similarly in each story reveals how the hands/fingers are used as a defiance of man and a lesson of woman’s strength. For the Inuit Sedna, there is a strong importance in the fact that he does not simply push her off, but chooses to cut each one of her fingers off individually,  ¨one joint at a time.¨ This action would inflict the most physical and emotional pain on her body and mind, brutally detaching her from recovery. The cutting of her fingers prevents her from reaching back to grab onto the boat where she is unable to save herself and is forced to the very bottom of the ocean to transform herself. This action is extreme and inflicts the ultimate amount of powerlessness onto an individual as it permanently disables Sedna’s ability to carry on through life to the full extent of her hands. The details are very brief, ¨ the father cut her fingers off, one joint at a time,¨ where the father is the main focal point of inflicting this quick yet everlasting pain upon Sedna’s life.  She is permanently incapacitated by her father where the text specifically states that Sedna ¨sank to the bottom of the ocean ̈ and established her new self and home on the ¨ocean floor.¨ At the bottom of the Ocean, she transforms and becomes a powerful sea goddess in defiance of the man who sentenced her to her death and the belief that she would drown. The roles are reversed as Sedna is now in charge of how much the men eat through her production of animals and their abundance to man. She is now the controller and is no longer controlled, all because of this literal detachment that was intended to drown her. The Water Will Carry Us Home is an African story beginning with a woman performing rituals with her hands, using her hands to guide the audience’s attention and focus on the acts she is performing. When the story begins, the women have tied hands and cannot perform the actions/rituals of their cultures, until the end when they become free. Their hands bound around their bodies prevent them from swimming, as they are limited in motion and are shown with no movement once they hit the water. Slaves at the time of the Middle Passage were thrown overboard to establish insurance claims for their owners, pregnant women would be of less value as they could not work or produce more children at the time they were bought. These women were at the hands of man and man’s wishes, in particular their owners and traders, who sought the worst for them, and for these women, the traders sought death. These women’s hands are constrained which forces an inability to resist, yet provides a chance for escape. The sense of tying provides a claustrophobic death and causes an emotional death, as even with the chance of releasing the hands, swimming forever is not an option. The women appear to drown during this scene, yet they defy the men who have manipulated them and the notion that they are victims to these men, instead they are survivors. The binding of their hands presents a symbol of male grip, when they are freed they are released from the men who figuratively and literally tied them down during the slave trade and would do so thereafter. These female entities free themselves from a state of complete despair and hopelessness, defying the initial assumption of death, and transforming into a future of power and control of their bodies and male bodies. These females transitioned from male-dominated positions as a princess and slaves, into goddesses and controllers, where they have the potential to not only control their own fate but to control those who attempt to control them or others.  


The examination of the finger-cutting scene from The Legend of Sedna the Sea Goddess in conjunction with the binding of the hands from The Water Will Carry Us Home presents defiance against the expectations of women in relation to men’s power. These stories showcase women who men control but they do not let this control take over their lives and allow them to become powerless. It is interesting to note that both of these women come from different backgrounds and positions in society, yet they meet the same successful end and the same journey of control away from men. For some reason hands have been a really interesting concept for me this year and understanding what hands can tell us when they are manipulated in different ways has been an interesting topic to explore.

The Requirement to be Useful

After reading this weeks poem, “We Are Mermaids,” the concept of usefulness and the land requirement of being useful in society and the unnecessary need of being useful in the ocean.

This theme was strong to me due to the last two stanzas of the poem, “You don’t have to be useful. You are not required to come up with something to say. You can spend your life benthic…”.

I had to read this section over a few times and am still trying to conceptualize what this means exactly, as there truly isn’t a purpose for everything in the Ocean. On land, people are held to high standards of contribution and are always expected to contribute financially, physically, mentally, etc. and when one is not contributing whether in a personal or group setting they are looked down upon and shamed. These are established regulations, stereotypes, and necessities that we as a society have placed upon ourselves and forced ourselves to adhere to. The Ocean is self-governed. I say this because it is important to understand, that the Ocean is self-governing and embraces all entities that contribute or do not contribute, there is no force or requirement to be something or say something, but to just be. The Ocean is one of the most if not the most powerful things on our Earth and governs almost all aspects of our life, yet it does so with light command and does not command its entities to behave in any specific way. On land, we are governed with constraints and are commanded to behave in specific ways, with laws, teachings, and regulations, that describe the way all societies must act to uphold their citizen standing. I’m not saying that this is wrong but it is interesting how two communities that are so invested in one another ( The Ocean and land) can be so opposing and different in their approach to governing and usefulness.

Final Essay Proposal

Through an exploration of physical and figurative trauma depicted in the Sedna story and “The Water Will Carry Us Home”, these narrative tales serve as symbols of rebirth and new beginnings for their respective communities. By incorporating trauma into the narrative of transformation, they teach valuable lessons about sacrifice and resilience. The communities specifically learn that through female adversity and sacrifice, there can be beauty and renewal.

Both tie into..

-Importance of both being woman and female-centered

-Sedna was powerful and slaves were not: why that matters, even those with power face unwilling sacrifice

-Power/strength

-Regrowth/Rebirth into something more powerful 

-cultural recognition that demands a retelling,

The Anxiety of Growing Up

As I read this book I feel a strong connection to Yetu, through the strong pressures that she faces from her community. It is clear that Yetu is constantly faced with overwhelming anxiety that causes her to think of suicide and even causes her to leave her family, community, and everything she knows behind. A quote that continues to live in my memory is, “She swam and she swam and she swam and she forgot the remembering, becoming more distant with each upward meter gained. They didn’t need her They were stronger than her, always had been.” The reason that this quote stood out to me was the idea of justification and justifications for anxiety. I feel that there are many times as a growing individual when I personally feel stressed and anxious and attempt to justify my decisions for abandoning these anxieties or stressful situations. I think that society tends to place a lot of pressure on growing individuals, especially in circumstances of passing down roles and expectations. Yetu encounters ideas of suicide and constantly refers to the idea of feeling drowned in her responsibilities, showcasing even further her overwhelming responsibilities. She feels deep pain and struggles to juggle her lifestyle with an important member of her society. Again, I truly feel her stress and I know that in the early moments of the story, she can be recognized as a relatable character to individuals who also battle with the responsibilities surrounding self and society.

The Fisherman and the Siren-Inescapable Temptation as a Religious Rebellion

Literature extends far beyond hardcover books and represents itself across multiple media including artwork. Artwork has been used for centuries to communicate and share messages of the time and additionally serves as a timestamp of opinions, teachings, and knowledge. Knut Ekwall’s, “The Fisherman and the Siren,” 1858, extends a compelling story that demonstrates the intensity of male desire and the inescapable consequences of yielding to temptation through a religious lens. During this time Luthern was the key religion in Sweden, where they believed that God would not allow his people to be tempted, and if he did he would save them, although God does not save the man in the painting. Ekwall utilizes the circle as a focal point, where everything from the water currents, the clouds, and even the figures themselves are based on a circular and revolving motion. These circular-based composition and imagery techniques used in the painting serve to demonstrate his cautionary lesson about the continuous loop of dangers involved in succumbing to the allure of forbidden desires. This painting is a religious rebellion that focuses on circularity and showcases the inevitable repetitive nature of desire/ temptation and the consequences that even God cannot save you from. 

In this painting, the fisherman is facing a moral dilemma as he fails to avoid the temptation of the Siren and succumbs to the power of her knowledge and voice. This failure to disregard temptation and the soon-to-be failure to survive is underlined with defiance towards the religion at the time, as Ekwall projects the anti-Luteran belief that God will not always provide a savior. Knut Ekwall depicts the exact moment after temptation strikes as the man is unwillingly being dragged beneath the water, reaching for an opportunity to save himself from his mistake. His hope for refuge is demonstrated in the straining of his arms which form a half circle on the outer layers of the whirlpool, that seeks to overtake him. With his arms in a half-circle shape and the position of his body, as being partially consumed by the Ocean, the painting showcases that he has not reached the totality of the endless temptation cycle. He reaches out but there is nothing to hold onto; at this moment his faith has left him, and powers that want to take him down are the only things left for him to reach for. This is Knut Ekwall’s rebellion in the form of circularity, the depiction of an endless cycle with vanishing hope for a man and his desires, circling one another down into death.  

In terms of positionality, the two figures’ bodies are wrapped around one another, as the Siren’s arms wrap around his underarms and her body swirls around him, where he is trapped underneath her. The concept of his body not just being within the water but being underneath her provides him no escape, where his only choice is to fall into the endless circle and into the depths of the ocean. Her hair becomes the water and begins its circulation of his body in movement with the water that seeks to overtake him. The swirling of the water begins to turn into a dangerous whirlpool that is unavoidable for the fisherman. She remains in control and floats gracefully above the water, luring him further and further into his death, where she grabs at his body as if she is attempting to release him from his grasp for safety. The position of their bodies in this encapsulating motion is critical to the argument which demonstrates the repetitive nature of desire and how powerless one is in the face of “successful” temptation. There is a contrast in how the beings connect to one another; the fisherman avoids her gaze as he is still attempting to find hope and the Siren fixes her eyes onto him showcasing her dominance and power, as she has won. 

The color choices in the artwork add additional evidence to highlight the rebellious argument of the circulatory-based behavior of temptation. The color of the fisherman’s shirt blends into the deep blue/grey colors of the water and the viewer is unable to see his lower half, as it has been submerged. The water slowly owns him and becomes a relic of its possession, as his body loses its separation from the dangerous ocean. This is highly contrasted in the way the Siren is depicted with her idyllic beauty and pale skin color, separating her from the water, and placing it above its grasp. Due to the contrasting colors, the Siren immediately becomes the main focus, which then leads the eye to the circular patterns in the water, then continuously wields the fisherman to his death. Her vibrant hair follows this circular pattern demonstrating the power she possesses within the water and her ability to control it, in contrast to the fisherman’s inability to avoid it. Her nude body alludes even more to the idea of temptation and the power of a woman to tempt a man, even to the extent of his death. By creating a juxtaposition between the idyllic beauty of the siren with the eery landscape, Ekwall develops an inescapable environment of danger that warns viewers that God may not save them from the tempting dangers within the Ocean. 

Ekwall’s painting holds a central claim that warns viewers that the pursuit of forbidden desires leads to inevitable destruction, and further cautions that God is incapable of saving one from such temptations. Ultimately, Ekwall’s “The Fisherman and the Siren”, 1858,  is a religious rebellion against the Luthern church and a defiance of the idea of God as a savior. Through his portrayal of the fisherman’s inner and physical struggle cast against the backdrop of the seas and Sirens, Ekwall highlights the destructive nature of succumbing to desires that have the potential to lead individuals to their deaths. This painting is a timeless reminder and warning of the importance of exercising restraint and resistance in the face of forbidden temptations.

The Siren and The Fisherman-Inescapable Temptation as a Religious Rebellion

Literature extends far beyond hardcover books and represents itself across multiple media including artwork. Artwork has been used for centuries to communicate and share messages of the time and additionally serves as a timestamp of opinions, teachings, and knowledge. Knut Ekwall’s, “The Fisherman and the Siren,” 1858, extends a compelling story that demonstrates the intensity of male desire and the inescapable consequences of yielding to temptation through a religious lens. During this time Luthern was the key religion in Sweden, where they believed that God would not allow his people to be tempted, and if he did he would save them, although God does not save the man in the painting. Ekwall utilizes the circle as a focal point, where everything from the water currents, the clouds, and even the figures themselves are based on a circular and revolving motion. These circular-based composition and imagery techniques used in the painting serve to demonstrate his cautionary lesson about the continuous loop of dangers involved in succumbing to the allure of forbidden desires. This painting is a religious rebellion that focuses on circularity and showcases the inevitable repetitive nature of desire/ temptation and the consequences that even God cannot save you from. 

In this painting, the fisherman is facing a moral dilemma as he fails to avoid the temptation of the Siren and succumbs to the power of her knowledge and voice. This failure to disregard temptation and the soon-to-be failure to survive is underlined with defiance towards the religion at the time, as Ekwall projects the anti-Luteran belief that God will not always provide a savior. Knut Ekwall depicts the exact moment after temptation strikes as the man is unwillingly being dragged beneath the water, reaching for an opportunity to save himself from his mistake. His hope for refuge is demonstrated in the straining of his arms which form a half circle on the outer layers of the whirlpool, that seeks to overtake him. With his arms in a half-circle shape and the position of his body, as being partially consumed by the Ocean, the painting showcases that he has not reached the totality of the endless temptation cycle. He reaches out but there is nothing to hold onto; at this moment his faith has left him, and powers that want to take him down are the only things left for him to reach for. This is Knut Ekwall’s rebellion in the form of circularity, the depiction of an endless cycle with vanishing hope for a man and his desires, circling one another down into death.  

In terms of positionality, the two figures’ bodies are wrapped around one another, as the Siren’s arms wrap around his underarms and her body swirls around him, where he is trapped underneath her. The concept of his body not just being within the water but being underneath her provides him no escape, where his only choice is to fall into the endless circle and into the depths of the ocean. Her hair becomes the water and begins its circulation of his body in movement with the water that seeks to overtake him. The swirling of the water begins to turn into a dangerous whirlpool that is unavoidable for the fisherman. She remains in control and floats gracefully above the water, luring him further and further into his death, where she grabs at his body as if she is attempting to release him from his grasp for safety. The position of their bodies in this encapsulating motion is critical to the argument which demonstrates the repetitive nature of desire and how powerless one is in the face of “successful” temptation. There is a contrast in how the beings connect to one another; the fisherman avoids her gaze as he is still attempting to find hope and the Siren fixes her eyes onto him showcasing her dominance and power, as she has won. 

The color choices in the artwork add additional evidence to highlight the rebellious argument of the circulatory-based behavior of temptation. The color of the fisherman’s shirt blends into the deep blue/grey colors of the water and the viewer is unable to see his lower half, as it has been submerged. The water slowly owns him and becomes a relic of its possession, as his body loses its separation from the dangerous ocean. This is highly contrasted in the way the Siren is depicted with her idyllic beauty and pale skin color, separating her from the water, and placing it above its grasp. Due to the contrasting colors, the Siren immediately becomes the main focus, which then leads the eye to the circular patterns in the water, then continuously wields the fisherman to his death. Her vibrant hair follows this circular pattern demonstrating the power she possesses within the water and her ability to control it, in contrast to the fisherman’s inability to avoid it. Her nude body alludes even more to the idea of temptation and the power of a woman to tempt a man, even to the extent of his death. By creating a juxtaposition between the idyllic beauty of the siren with the eery landscape, Ekwall develops an inescapable environment of danger that warns viewers that God may not save them from the tempting dangers within the Ocean. 

Ekwall’s painting holds a central claim that warns viewers that the pursuit of forbidden desires leads to inevitable destruction, and further cautions that God is incapable of saving one from such temptations. Ultimately, Ekwall’s “The Fisherman and the Siren”, 1858,  is a religious rebellion against the Luthern church and a defiance of the idea of God as a savior. Through his portrayal of the fisherman’s inner and physical struggle cast against the backdrop of the seas and Sirens, Ekwall highlights the destructive nature of succumbing to desires that have the potential to lead individuals to their deaths. This painting is a timeless reminder and warning of the importance of exercising restraint and resistance in the face of forbidden temptations.

The Water Will Carry Us ( to Movement)

This week I wanted to focus on the Stop Motion Animation, ¨The Water Will Carry Us Home¨ by Gabrielle Tesfaye. I wanted to focus on this blog post specifically for the way that it was filmed and for the way that the story was told, focusing on the developmental elements of the film. The film opens with a woman where the audience is walking through what appears to be a ritual that she is performing. The camera follows her through prayer, the burning of candles, her stretched ears, the henna on her hands, the burning of incents, etc. Where the audience is carefully exposed to the woman and her culture, as her presence fills the entire screen and all of the camera angles are very close up, forcing you to look at the woman and her actions. This showcases culture and how one may utilize art and body to represent themselves.

This scene switches into the stop motion scenes that felt unsettling to me due to the movement of the objects and the music that came along with the transition. I think it is interesting how the figures move in a stop-motion way because it is so much different than the ocean it is trying to represent, as the ocean does not stop and is only ever in constant movement. The film switches to the movement of real water and the actual ocean after the story is commenced. I believe that this describes how there is movement in resolution, meaning that in order to resolve something you must be uncomfortable, you will face rockiness that may feel like a stop motion, but at the end of the rockiness and uncomfortableness you have the potential to flow. While it seems cliche I feel like its important to point out, because water is movement and leads us to movement through movement. The theme of moving or not moving ( through stop-motion) is important and means something for the essence of the film and the essence of our lives.

There is almost this magical touch to the film as the music in the ending and beginning plays like a Siren song. As I watched it drew me in and gave me a comfort that I did not feel when the music was stopped. While confused by this film, I enjoyed it, and enjoyed how the artist told their story.

The “Emptiness” of the Ocean

The Ocean is a expansive world that contains multiple different dimensions that we have not yet allocated the resources to explore. This wide mass holds mystery, beauty, and overarching powers that defy our slightest comprehension of the Ocean’s potential in the world. As stated the Ocean heavily surpasses our comprehension as we, at first glance, may perceive the ocean as an empty void yet these infinite expanses, contain life beyond human understanding. In humanity’s typical approach to Earth we perceive ourselves as the masters of the world and the rulers of our environment. Although this idea immediately crumbles when humans are confronted with the magnitude of the Ocean and face the struggle of being humbled by our own egos. We are nothing in comparison to the Ocean and its vastness, the depth of society has no comparison to the depth of the Ocean.

While we conquer society on land we have failed to conquer the ocean. In my opinion I don’t think we will ever have the potential to fully dominate the Ocean and unfortunately do not think that society will delegate the resources to do so. I include the image of the mermaid swimming in the Ocean because it barely scrapes the surface on how big the Ocean truly is, in comparison to our own bodies. The world is 70% water, in which we are surrounded and dominated by its power. The image is directly from the video and I think it is an emphasis of our position in the world, even all powerful mermaids do not compare to the size of the Ocean. While our comfort is in the land, we must force ourselves to explore the vastness that proceeds us as it is the bane of our existence. The Ocean serves as a timeless entity that is everything but “empty” as it is filled with every reminder of our creation and adaptations. Rather than view the Ocean as an empty vessel we should view it as a space of infinite potential and opportunity. We must allow ourselves to erase our egos against the Ocean and acknowledge our existence as “less than” in the face of the Ocean, as once we recognize the power the Ocean has, we can learn to join our powers and work in unison.

Constant, Conquering, and Claiming ( The Ocean)

The Ocean Reader: Theory, Culture, Politics. ‘Introduction” by Eric Paul Roorda explores the pivotal societal changes around the ocean in language and action. “Because the Ocean can’t be plowed, paved, or shaped in ways the eye is able to discern, it has seemed to be a constant, while the land has changed drastically over the centuries.” This quote is extremely important when understanding the concept of conquering the ocean and how modern scientists, explorers, etc. constantly desire to claim something as their own. The difference between the word “constant” in connection to the ocean and the phrase ” changed drastically” with the ocean is based upon false realities. The ocean is one of the most non-constant regions in the world yet it is marketed as a place that is “constant” and “without history.”

The ocean is difficult to claim as it is constantly moving yet claiming the ocean and discovering it is a huge pursuit of our modern-day explorations. The text states, “The stylebook spelling of “ocean” diminishes it as a geological reference. To capitalize on Ocean is to challenge the conventional wisdom that the sea can be taken for granted. They cannot.” I like this quote because it specifically showcases the wording and how we use the word “Ocean” to represent the world’s relationship to it. Throughout history, society has led through the action of claiming and conquering and has never failed to attempt to establish boundaries and borders. It is in human nature to want to claim something as “mine,” it is one of the first few words we are able to say as children. The issue or should I say upside is that the ocean cannot be conquered, it is almost physically impossible as it is so large and so fluid. I added the image down below due to the theme of conquering through “flags,” we discover something and we place a flag, the moon landing, place a flag… but in the ocean, there is nowhere to place a flag. How do we conquer something that is constantly shifting and moving? Is it possible to truly establish boundaries in the ocean?

From STEM to STEAM

¨STEM be expanded to STEAM to recognize how the arts contribute to inventiveness in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.¨ This is a direct quote from the “The Emergence of Environmental Humanities” article by Robert S. Emmett and David E. Tying it back to the quote, something that I found interesting about this week’s reading was the concept of STEM being transitioned to STEAM due to the importance of arts in science, technology, engineering, and medical fields. The arts include additions such as ¨humanities, language arts, dance, drama, music, visual arts, design, and new media¨” which are claimed to all add to the value of the concepts within STEM.

This is a widely debated topic yet has been granted a lot of support as STEAM adds to the ¨problem-based learning methods used in the creative process.¨ This is a topic and change that I agree with because I believe the arts are extremely important in contributing to scientific knowledge and participation. In this class, we discuss heavily the topic of art and the different variations of art in the media and society. I wanted to use this post as a way of focusing on art and focusing on the exact quote stated at the beginning of this blog post. The word ¨inventiveness¨ is key to recognize because the arts play a crucial and pivotal role in our study of science, technology, and medicine because it is how we as a society communicate our relationship with the environment. Currently, we use the media to demonstrate our understanding of our position in the environment and the changes that we need to make, not make, etc. We see art in the form of design, graphics, language, etc. that demonstrate these positions, which is why it is important to have art as a standout in the STEM field and be recognized as a crucial role.

https://theconversation.com/explainer-whats-the-difference-between-stem-and-steam-95713#:~:text=STEM%20represents%20science%2C%20technology%2C%20engineering,using%20STEAM%20to%20make%20discoveries.